Category: Law Firm

In the realm of legal practice, there are numerous specialisations to be found. Criminal, corporate, family and environmental law are just a few examples of the numerous branches this sphere comprises. Among these specialisations, one role is undeniably vital and universally present across all areas of law – the role of the ‘litigator.’

A litigator is more commonly known as a trial lawyer. They specialise in representing plaintiffs and defendants in civil cases and manage all phases of the litigation process from the investigation, pleadings, and discovery through the pre-trial, trial, settlement, and appeals processes. However, the role and responsibilities of a litigator extend beyond the boundaries of a courtroom, making them an integral part of any legal system around the globe.

Definition: Litigator

At its core, a litigator is a licensed attorney who represents a party in a dispute, with the aim of enforcing, defending or establishing a legal right. Although the reward often comes in monetary terms, their ultimate objective is ensuring the enforcement of justice and the rule of law. This responsibility comes with a complex set of skills, knowledge, and a deep understanding of the legal landscape.

However, not all litigators are alike as their expertise can be drawn upon for a wide range of legal disputes. Hence, it’s important to understand the types of litigators that are commonly found within the sphere of law.

Types of Litigators

Commercial litigators are experts in handling disputes between businesses, whereas civil litigators represent individuals in non-criminal disputes. Specialty litigators focus on specific areas like medical malpractice or intellectual property.

Then there’s another breed of specialist litigators who are entrusted with ensuring the smooth functioning of one of the most complex and essential parts of urban living – strata communities.

Strata Lawyers Sydney are litigators adept at handling a broad array of strata-related legal complexities. These experts have an in-depth understanding of strata law and regulations associated with the management and operation of strata schemes. With the boom in high-rise living, the work of strata litigators has become increasingly important. They provide vital counsel and representation to strata corporations, lot owners, and management teams, dealing with matters such as by-law enforcement, disputes, construction defects, insurance claims and strata management, to name a few.

Role of Litigators

Irrespective of their specialisations, litigators generally perform several key roles. They represent their clients through every phase of a lawsuit, from its inception to its conclusion. This includes conducting pre-litigation assessments, drafting and filing pleadings and motions, conducting pre-trial discoveries, presenting arguments at trials, negotiating settlements, and drafting and arguing appeals, if required.

Furthermore, litigators also have a responsibility to their clients outside of the courtroom. This involves providing legal counsel, guiding their clients through legal procedures, and helping them understand their legal rights and obligations. In essence, litigators operate as both legal advisors and advocates for their clients, ensuring that their rights and interests are duly protected and represented.

Conclusion

Thus, in conclusion, the definition of a litigator extends beyond being merely a trial lawyer. They are legal guardians, navigating clients through the complex and often intimidating maze of law. Whether they are commercial litigators, civil litigators, specialty litigators or Strata Lawyers Sydney, their unwavering commitment to upholding the rule of law and justice is what truly defines their role in our society.

By Winston P. McDonald

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer. One thing is certain. With or without Obama Care, there is going to be a tremendous demand for RNs. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching released a study in December 2009 indicating that nursing education programs need to increase their capacity by 90% to meet current and projected shortages.

So, my question is this. Is there anything in the Healthcare Reform Bill to address this problem of an ongoing shortage of RNs? Sadly, the answer is no. In fact, rather than creating incentives to double almost the number of nurses our country’s schools are graduating, which is what the Carnegie study says we need, the bill has become another affirmative action program. Here’s a synopsis of what the bill offers to graduate more nurses from our medical programs.

If a medical school desires to receive contracts and grants from the federal government, it must prove to the Health and Human Services Secretary that it operates under a quota system by training individuals from under- represented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds.

Is this really a solution to our nursing shortage? Or is it designed to garner support from minority voters at the expense of the needs of our nation’s healthcare industry? You must understand that although this may alleviate shortages in some areas of the country with significant minority populations, other areas of the country will be hung out to dry, simply because there are not enough minorities to recruit. Isn’t our nursing shortage too important an issue to become a political football?

There is nothing in the legislation to address the faculty/student ratio. This is the principal reason we aren’t matriculating more nurses from our educational system. There simply isn’t sufficient faculty to teach all those who apply. The number of faculty members qualified to teach nursing is dwindling. Their ranks are shrinking due to retirement and other factors. A meaningful reform package would address this problem. Instead, we get affirmative action!

Our government has but three options:

1. Adjust the faculty/student ratio to allow more students to enter nursing programs.

2. Create incentives that will increase available faculty. 3. Raise the number of work visas granted to foreign nurses.

Let’s examine these options in a little more depth.

If we change the faculty/student ratio, there is the possibility that we will matriculate nurses with weaker skills. Scratch this one.

Creating incentives to increase available faculty does not seem to have a downside, provided it is not politicized.

Bringing in foreign nurses, is, in effect, outsourcing American jobs. Not a positive for our country as the manufacturing industry has clearly demonstrated. We already have an unemployment rate unprecedented since the Great Depression.

We must pressure our local, state and national representatives to address the nursing shortage in a manner that benefits our country, our healthcare delivery system and our people. There certainly must be other solutions to the problem beyond what I have proposed. Press our government officials to find the best solution, for healthcare, for our country and our people.

About the Author: Winston P. McDonald enjoys writing for Uniformhaven.com which sells bab phat lab coats and cheap scrubs with free shipping as well as a host of additional products.

Source: isnare.com

Permanent Link: isnare.com/?aid=608244&ca=Career